Skip to main content

An Arneson Clapback, or The Distortions of Axe-Grinding Revisionism

David Wesely, Gary Gygax, Dave Arneson (l-r)


I posted the below on Facebook recently, and it is a sentiment I'm compelled to express all too frequently in discussions about the creators of Dungeons & Dragons on Facebook's gaming discussion groups in response to the gratuitous Gary Gygax bashing I see these days.

"Dave Arneson gets way too much credit these days. David Wesely latched onto the role playing idea from germinal variations found in early kriegspiels, and Arneson repurposed Gary Gygax’s Chainmail rules to emulate Wesely’s idea in a different setting. Arneson was no game designer and could never hope to organize and codify a rule set for publication. You just have to look at what he produced in the field to see that (try reading and using that mess called First Fantasy Campaign). While Gygax was churning out huge hardcover tomes that became the foundational bedrock for the game, Arneson was so useless at producing anything around the TSR offices that he eventually was put in charge of the mail room in the hopes that he might be of help filling orders since he wasn’t actually concentrating on developing any gaming material when he managed to show up at HQ. Arneson, if anything, deserves less credit than the current fad tries to bestow on him, undoubtedly inspired by that amateurish Secrets of Blackmoor video. The case for lionizing Arneson is weak-sauce revisionism."

My above argument against Arneson is cast in pretty much the simplest terms--and is admittedly pretty harsh--though I don't think there is anything inaccurate there. Was he an important part of the equation? Absolutely. But I think, from what I have read and seen, that it is a huge distortion to give him out-sized credit for the development of the game beyond some loose ideas that emerged from Chainmail and the Wesely-inspired homebrew basement games. None of this happened in a vacuum for Wesely, Arneson, or Gygax...there was a rich gaming history that preceded and surrounded all of it (before even entering these debates, please at least read Jon Peterson's Playing at the World). This post is mostly a clapback against the recent push to disproportionately elevate Arneson and relegate Gygax to the role of merely being a "good businessmen" or, even less charitably, a thief of some sort (an idea the shoddy video Secrets of Blackmoor not so subtly tries to peddle). Frankly, the evidence for Gary Gygax as "good businessmen" is hard to find; he was, however, an obsessive gamer and game designer who was driven to try to make a living doing what he was passionate about. Gary has plenty of faults, and I'm certainly not trying to deify him, but as Wesely himself has said, if it wasn't for the multitude of skills and determination Gygax brought to the table, D&D would never have been anything more than a loose RPG-like game played by a group of guys in a couple of St. Paul basements.

I will also note that a friend made the worthwhile point to me that Arneson could have very easily struggled with some issues (ADHD, autism?) that may have made it hard for him to be more focused and productive (as a special ed teacher, this is my friend's area of expertise, not mine). This struck me as a very fair point, which also makes me a little uncomfortable that my framing of Arneson might sound mean spirited. I certainly don't mean to imply he was shiftless or lazy; game design, development, and codifying rules in a coherent way just may not have been in his personal make up, which certainly isn't a character flaw. And creative writing, which adventure design is at its heart, is another skill set that Arneson also didn't seem to have a knack for. But it does sound like he had an excitable imagination and could run a fun table in the right context.

Personally I'm looking forward to the seemingly far more fair-minded examinations promised in the upcoming documentaries, The Great Kingdom and Dreams in Gary's Basement. I'm hoping that those will serve as something of an antidote to the axe-grinding distortions found in Secrets of Blackmoor, especially for those who insist on expounding on the history of the hobby having only watched the latter without investing the time to actually read Peterson's book.

Anyway, I've got that off my chest. Happy to hear other's views...

Apologia: This post jumps right into the deep end of the current state of the debate over the history of the role-playing game hobby, so it might not be of interest to everyone. I didn't do a lot of context setting here; this is mostly for folks who know these personages and at least something about the events that led to the development of Dungeons & Dragons. I wanted a link that I could point to in these debates on Facebook rather than having to reformulate these ideas every time I feel compelled to weigh in.



Comments

  1. Replies
    1. This American does not hate you, Joe. He is a disabled veteran who served his nation proudly, but would understand if you were troubled the many divisions in our nation now and the immature way our citizens and media are handling our many problems. I would add others to that list, but I did mention that I'm a disabled vet, didn't I. I believe that the creation of Dungeons and Dragons was even more of a group effort than most people are willing to believe. Just where would we be without the original play testers and the feedback they provided to Mr. Gygax et al?

      Delete
  2. I enjoyed Secrets of Blackmoor. I went into it knowing that it had a strong perspective, and that the makers of the project were going to try to convince me of something. That's fine. What I liked about it was the input from those who were around Dave (and to a lesser extent Gary) back when all of this was getting started. I thought segments on Braunstein hewed rather closely to the narrative that can be found in Peterson's book.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A big part of the push for revisionism with Gygax is a psychological sign of the times. It is not as if the rumblings of "yea but" hasn't been around for three decades with TSR and Gary. The seed finally gets some water, fertilizer and the soothing whines of the mediocre.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Late to this post, but had to say: thank you. Thank you for making feel like I wasn't alone in my distaste for the Arneson-deifying/Gygax-villifying trend I've been seeing. Nice to see there are still at least a few sane people in the world...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Well-thumbed posts

Take the High Road: Making Cheap and Easy Dirt Roads

I have wanted some good roads to add to my games for a while now. My first attempt was a couple of years ago when my standards were a bit lower and I wasn't sure how much I was interested in investing in this new hobby. I bought some PDFs of cobblestone roads that I sized, printed, and glued to felt. The result was okay, but the way my laser printer  produced the roads ended up being quite reflective to the point of almost being glossy looking. The combination of glue, paper, and felt also meant the roads had a wavy consistency and almost always curled at the edges. I used them once or twice but was never happy with them. My sub-par first attempt at making roads for my games using felt strips, glue, and printed designs. You can see how shiny and how wavy and curled at the edges they turned out. I never felt good about putting them on the table for our games and eventually stopped altogether. I've been meaning to take another crack at making some roads now that I have

Lost Art of D&D No. 2: Games Workshop's Holmes Basic (1977)

After Games Workshop attained the license to print a co-branded edition of TSR's 1977 Dungeons & Dragons basic rules book, they set about putting their own stamp on it, designing a new cover and replacing a number of the illustrations they deemed too crudely drawn for their U.K. market.  The cover art was by John Blanche at the very start of his career as a fantasy illustrator. Blanche went on to be a mainstay at Games Workshop, producing countless illustrations for them. His fannish enthusiasm for the material--as an artist as well as a lifelong gamer--has deservedly made him a favorite over the decades. I first encountered Blanche's work in the David Day compendium, A Tolkien Bestiary (1978), to which he contributed five illustrations that sit comfortably alongside the book's chief illustrator, Ian Miller. I have a special fondness for this book, having coveted it as a child during my incipient Middle Earth fixation. My parent's procured an out-of-print copy of t

Chainmail: Battle for the Borderlands

It's always a pleasure to find new wargaming friends, especially when they fall in line with your own gaming ethos and level of dedication to crafting fun games. Eric Hoffman had been scheduled to be a game master at Scrum Con in both 2019 and 2020, but family illnesses torpedoed his intentions both times. It's no fun as a convention organizer to have to scramble to find a replacement GM at the last minute, but life often gets in the way regardless of best intentions, and I completely understood his situation.   But having never met Eric, it was hard to know if it was a big loss to our con and its players who had signed up for his games. Now that I've had the chance to play with Eric a couple of times, I can definitively confirm that it was indeed a big loss, and now I'm really looking forward to him being able to run a game for folks at a future Scrum Con. Eric finally did get to attend a Scrum Con event of a sort when we hosted our virtual Summer Invitational back i

Striking Back Against COVID-19: Free Conan Scenarios for 'Sellswords & Spellslingers'

Long-time readers of the blog will remember the adaptation of "Beyond the Black River" I started working on in the spring of 2018 for the  Sellswords & Spellslingers  rules. I ran it for the first time at Historicon 2018, and have now run it at several conventions and game days since. Sellswords & Spellslingers is designed for solo and co-op play, so to do my bit in helping the game community in its fight against boredom during these isolating pandemic days, I've decided to gather and organize all of the material I developed for my convention scenarios and make it freely available as a download via this blog. At the link further down is a 68-page PDF file with all of my player aids and notes. Of all of the major solo/co-op miniatures rules that have been released in the past few years, Sellswords & Spellslingers  is hands down the best if unfortunately not the most widely known or used. I highly encourage you to buy a copy of the rules, if you

All Together Now: 'Sellswords & Spellslingers' and the Pleasures of Cooperative Gaming

I've always enjoyed a good competitive match as much as the next guy, whether it was sports in high school or video games (HALO, etc.) in my thirties. But regardless of the game, I've always been partial to team play, and the best cooperative games put all of the focus on succeeding as a team. That's one of the reasons I was enthusiastic about getting Andrea Sfiligoi's latest release,  Sellswords & Spellslingers (Ganesha Games), on the table for this month's Second Saturday Scrum Club gathering. Last year I had organized a Halloween game ( recap ) to beta-test Sfiligoi's Run From the Dead , which is built atop the same cooperative mechanics as Sellswords . I was surprised when I discovered these rules were re-skinned for the fantasy genre and released last December ahead of Run From the Dead . Hopefully, the zombie apocalypse version of the rules is not too far behind because I definitely think  Run From the Dead  is the best tabletop miniatures rule s