Skip to main content

Scrumlandia: The Start of Something Special?



The Second Saturday Scrum Club played another game of Chainmail this weekend, after having such a swell time back in January when Keith Sloan ran his "Battle of Emridy Meadows" scenario for us using the rules.

But first we spent an hour and a half brainstorming and “blue-skying” how we might cobble together our own Braunstein-esque RPG/wargame campaign, discussing how we might borrow concepts and mechanics from a variety of sources spanning the entire gamut of fantasy gaming’s history, from Arneson’s Blackmoor and Gygax's Castle & Crusades Society games to a variety of RPG systems over the decades that have attempted to incorporate "domain" creation and management rules up to what we're able to glean from the blog postings for the upcoming Oathmark wargame system. 

Rich brought over a slew of different RPG systems we might want to consider for the sessions in the campaign in which we scale down to that level of action. We've also revived an occasionally discussed idea of getting the old TSR Battlesystem on the table (something of which John and I both have owned one edition or another of for decades and have yet to play). Battlesystem (especially 2nd ed.) feels a lot like a cleaned up and expanded version of Chainmail at heart, so it might be what we end up adopting when the story arc telescopes back out to mass battle sessions. 





Rich remembered some potentially useful material from a "world building" issue of Dragon Magazine (#293), and John had once for another game group tried pulling together something akin to what we're developing which has some nice material we're likely to plunder for our own game.

We're not completely sure how we're going to organize it all, which is exciting and a little intimidating, as all blank slates are. I'd really like to develop a way for us to run it without somebody having to take on the role and work of game mastering the entire thing, which is how these games are usually played. I think this is where we might be able to develop some novel subsystems and mechanics for resolving certain parts of the game.

Here are some very raw ideas I've floated that we'd need to develop further but might get us on the path to a referee-free campaign model: 
  1. Regularly Updated Between-Game Event Tables. Between games each player would have to roll on a couple of events tables, one with unforeseen benefits and another with unanticipated challenges/setbacks. These tables would get refreshed by the group in between games with every player contributing two new "events" to the beneficial and detrimental tables. Example events on such tables might be something like a plague sickens all of the horses in that player's kingdom, reducing their effectiveness in the next battle, or a bumper crop allows the hiring of some mercenaries to augment your forces in the next battle. Because the tables would get updated between each session, some of the events that players contribute to the tables could possibly reflect developments in the world up to that point in the game. For example, after a battle in one session, somebody might populate these event tables with some events related to the outcome of that battle (e.g., the violent storm evoked by the wizard in the last battle makes any flying units reluctant to join the next battle, or, say, the violent storm in the last battle means the plains have flooded and the next battle will be fought on fields that are now one-third marsh lands). 
  2. Shared Between-Game Storytelling Mechanics. I also want develop some way to allow us to plot non-combat activities between games, a simple mechanic to resolve the probability of success/failure and the outcome of either. The idea needs more refinement, but one possibility would be for each player to simultaneously announce 1-2 ulterior objective in between games, say, for example, arranging a marriage between my king's son and a royal daughter in a neutral kingdom. Or perhaps I try to send a stealth group of elite guard to steal a dragon's egg that a nearby group of orc's found. Or my dwarves want to prospect for new gold veins in the nearby mountain range to increase my kingdom's wealth. These are sub-plots/objectives that can be made up "whole cloth" by each player as the game unfolds; none of these things should be game breakers, but they would add narrative flair and provide the opportunity for small advantages or failures. These "sub plot" tasks would need to have three components (1) a statement of action, (2) an explanation for why it is at all plausible, and (3) the proposed outcome. The success or failure of this subplot would then be determined by having all of the other players anonymously assign the task a difficulty or probability rating (say, level 1-5, easy to hard) according to how persuasive and realistic it was presented. Those assigned levels are averaged, and then there's a simple die roll of some sort to determine the level of success against that averaged difficulty rating. Let's take two possible examples:     
         (a) Say I make up a sub-plot in which I want my dwarves to go prospecting in some mountains in my own kingdom to look for a new vein of gold which I propose would allow me to upgrade one unit of my light footmen to armored footmen. Everybody secretly throws a chit in a bag rated 1-5 (easy to hard); there are three players who think that sounds very doable and throw in a "1" chit in the bag, two players rate it a "2," and one player thinks that task should be a "3" level of difficulty. If there are six players besides myself, that would equal a 10 out of a total 30 points, which we might deem according to our "Task Difficulty" chart to fall in the "Moderately Easy to Achieve" category. The player with that objective then rolls a d12 against a target number for that category of difficulty (say that "Moderately Easy to Achieve" tasks need a roll of four or higher to succeed). A roll of 1 or 12 has special consequences that a random player can decide (e.g., I rolled a one, so it is decided that a cave in in those mines means I actually lost a unit of light foot, or a 12 means I actually struck a really large vein and can upgrade the armor for two units instead of the proposed one).
          (b) Say I want to assassinate the general of the dwarven forces in another player's kingdom. I make the case why I think I have a shot for succeeding. Players anonymously throw in chits grading the difficulty, and this time the results are a 24 out of a possible 30, which places it in the "Improbable" category, requiring a roll of 11 or higher to succeed on a d12.

Each Player Running Two Distinct Factions
One idea I've put on the table is that each player would potentially have two sets of forces in their domain of control, a grouping of "good" and a grouping of "bad" actors in a region. So, in practice, as a player I might claim a region in which I run a dwarven city-state with some smaller human settlements, but I would also have as part of my domain an underground city of goblins and their hill giant henchmen. 


So, maybe for one session I'm running the goblins in my region against the elves in somebody else's region, but in the next session my dwarves are joining up with another player's troops to fight off belligerents from another player's forces of "not-good"/chaos. I guess one thing I like about the idea is that nobody has to commit to playing "good" or "bad" guys for the entire campaign. I might enjoy leading a small army of rat men or undead from my domain sometimes, but I don't know if I'd want to lock myself into that for a full campaign.

"Winter Is Coming," or Narrative Focal Points for Campaigns/Seasons
I really like the idea of each campaign or season being organized around some central theme or narrative, some sort of event or dilemma that we all have to contend with in our own ways. So, if each "season" takes something like six to eight sessions to conclude (e.g., five big battles plus three RPG sessions), then each player might have their own chosen individual objectives and priorities (as every province naturally would) but also some overarching objective or event all the players are contending with at the climax of the campaign.

The Battle of Red Crag

Here are some photos from the battle we enacted at our gathering. Good times were had, even though Chainmail felt a little creakier without Keith as referee who would have quickly resolved some of the questions and ambiguities we bumped into. That said, Chainmail is still a very quick playing and bloody game, which I like a lot.



(l-r) Jared and John
(top to bottom): Joe and Rich




(l-r): Steve and Jared 



Rich











































 Parting Shots and Closing Thoughts

It's interesting how quickly this game is coming together. From the time I started writing this blog two days ago to now, John Sears has already developed some cool ideas around establishing the geography of our domains and the starting forces we might derive from them. I'll keep folks posted on those and more as this progresses. Perhaps this is an upside of the coronavirus: Folks are focusing their attention and new free time from foregoing commutes on fun past times like this. I'm just hoping we all live to get to play this game!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Comments

  1. That is something special and looks amazing to boot. Sound like it got everyone's creativity working too.
    Good luck staying alive over there :D.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the kind note. Hope you and yours are coping well in these strange times...

      Delete

Post a Comment

Well-thumbed posts

Chainmail: Battle of Emridy Meadows

In my imagination, Chainmail has always been that shadowy precursor to Dungeons & Dragons that I was both intrigued by yet leery of. I loved the idea of a game involving mass battles in a fantasy setting akin to those depicted in the The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings, but I also had a sense that Chainmail, released in 1971 a mere year after I was born, was likely a clunky wargame that would be too frustrating to bother mastering. It also didn't help that my first inkling of its existence was around 1980 or so when I could never dream of amassing the miniature armies needed to play out these massive conflicts. No, back then I was pretty sure Chainmail was the province of grizzled old grognards who had started wargaming before I was even born.

Even after my gaming rebirth decades later in 2016, I was fine with letting the dim past remain so, and was more than content during my first couple of years back in the hobby exploring rules of a more recent vintage and manageable scale…

Lost Art of D&D: Alex Nuckols

Artist Alex Nuckols made what disappointingly ended up being a minor yet still evocative contribution to the visual history of D&D with a series of paintings he was commissioned to produce for a school supply company named St. Regis. It seems he painted nearly a dozen pieces that graced the covers of D&D-themed notebooks, folders, and three-ring binders in 1980-81. As a D&D-obsessed kid of 10-11 years old at the time, I owned three or four of these and have never parted with them. 

Here are some examples I found online. I’ve always regretted that Nuckols didn’t produce work for any actual gaming material released by TSR (or any game company) because to this day I think he captured the gritty feel and texture of how I imagined these fantasy worlds in my mind’s eye. He was certainly a more accomplished artist than many of those who ended up in the stable as staff at TSR at the time. Artistically, his compositions are always compelling and typically eschew the over-heroic pose…

All Together Now: 'Sellswords & Spellslingers' and the Pleasures of Cooperative Gaming

I've always enjoyed a good competitive match as much as the next guy, whether it was sports in high school or video games (HALO, etc.) in my thirties. But regardless of the game, I've always been partial to team play, and the best cooperative games put all of the focus on succeeding as a team. That's one of the reasons I was enthusiastic about getting Andrea Sfiligoi's latest release, Sellswords & Spellslingers (Ganesha Games), on the table for this month's Second Saturday Scrum Club gathering.

Last year I had organized a Halloween game (recap) to beta-test Sfiligoi's Run From the Dead, which is built atop the same cooperative mechanics as Sellswords. I was surprised when I discovered these rules were re-skinned for the fantasy genre and released last December ahead of Run From the Dead. Hopefully, the zombie apocalypse version of the rules is not too far behind because I definitely think Run From the Dead is the best tabletop miniatures rule set I've …

Historicon 2019: New Digs, Epic Games

Historicon is turning into one of the highlights of my summer. I've developed some fond friendships over the past three years of attending and feel like I'm beginning to be more a part of a community and less a neophyte or spectator. It was at the first Historicon I attended in 2017 that I met future fellow Scrum Clubbers Walt O'Hara and Steve Braun, and the circle of gaming friends has expanded significantly from there to include great guys like Ivor Evans, Miles Reidy, Jeff Allen, Joe Bloch, Eric Schlegel, and a bunch of the HAWKs gaming group (Don, Duncan, Buck, Chris, Greg, Bill, et al.).

The two hour trip up to Lancaster Friday morning made for a lovely drive with the convertible's top down and Spotify blaring out a summer tunes mix. I had found a great Airbnb condo five blocks from the convention, but I decided to go straight to Historicon without checking in (which finally happened a bone-weary dozen hours later and well after midnight).

I spent most of that fi…

Scrum Con 2020: A Leap Forward!

Scrum Con 2020 was held last weekend in Silver Spring, Maryland on Leap Day, which seems fitting in that the convention itself took quite a jump forward from 2019: More than double the number of games, more than double the number of attendees, double the number of convention t-shirt designs, and three times the space.

And we sold the show out again! 

We had about 215 registered attendees and filled almost 275 seats in the 35 games we offered over the course of the day. We had folks come from some distance to attend, including Philadelphia, West Virginia, New Jersey, and other exotic locales that I'm sure I'm forgetting. As always, we organize the convention as an equal split between miniatures games and role-playing games, and I was pleased to see even more attendees this year sign up for one of each type.

We're admittedly small as far as these things go, but I think the quality of the experience we offer is a cut above, and we put a lot of effort into everything from the pri…

Striking Back Against COVID-19: Free Conan Scenarios for 'Sellswords & Spellslingers'

Long-time readers of the blog will remember the adaptation of "Beyond the Black River" I started working on in the spring of 2018 for the Sellswords & Spellslingers rules. I ran it for the first time at Historicon 2018, and have now run it at several conventions and game days since.

Sellswords & Spellslingers is designed for solo and co-op play, so to do my bit in helping the game community in its fight against boredom during these isolating pandemic days, I've decided to gather and organize all of the material I developed for my convention scenarios and make it freely available as a download via this blog. At the link further down is a 68-page PDF file with all of my player aids and notes.
Of all of the major solo/co-op miniatures rules that have been released in the past few years, Sellswords & Spellslingers is hands down the best if unfortunately not the most widely known or used. I highly encourage you to buy a copy of the rules, if you haven’t already, a…